3.3 Reflection: Using Web 2.0 Tools
If I were to use Diigo in my classroom, I would start by having students select an article about a topic of their choice to work with. I would have them start with some basic annotation strategies: highlighting key terms in one color; main ideas in another color; supporting details in yet another color. I would them have them go through and use the note/memo function to make notes with specific objectives. I would have them explain why they highlighted particular key terms, their justification for selecting a sentence as a main idea, and how the supporting details actually work to support the claim. As a follow-up to this assignment, students would need to go back through and make notes about the rhetorical purpose for some of the areas they identified, as well as the rhetorical strategies the author was using. The final part of the assignment would be to write a reflection (in a creative format) that would evaluate how effectively the author had achieved his or her objective in writing the article.
This experience would probably be initially somewhat challenging for the students. Depending on the amount of experience the class had with annotation in general, I would anticipate needing to spend some time instructing students in effective annotation strategies (or find a video or other resource that demonstrates the same thing). Students who have more experience in annotation or using other processes for evaluating writing will do reasonably well; students who have less experience will probably start out with superficial notes and annotations and require additional future practice in order to do this type of assignment with the depth of thought I expect. I do anticipate some scaffolding will be needed depending on the prior experiences of my class.
The outcome of this assignment is to evaluate the structure of writing and the overall effectiveness of the author's use of rhetorical strategies. This is consistent with the critical reading and writing component of a number of Common Core literacy and ELA standards. Students who are critical readers are critical thinkers, and critical thinking is something our students really need more practice in.
In addition to using Diigo as a primary tool for addressing the assignment, I would encourage students to find a unique approach (using a web 2.0 toold of their choice) to present their analysis/evaluation of the author's work. Areas that will need to be addressed to ensure success are: having a clear rubric for both the annotation and evaluative product, providing clear and specific examples of annotation strategies (including examples of well-done annotation compared to poorly-done annotation), and possibly providing students a list of some potential web 2.0 tools for the final product.
